Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.authorArsan, Belde
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Emine Zehra
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-25T09:34:56Z
dc.date.available2022-09-25T09:34:56Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationGünaçar, D. N., Köse, T. E., Arsan, B., & Aydın, E. Z. (2022). Radioanatomic study of maxillary sinus palatal process pneumatization. Oral radiology, 38(3), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00569-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn0911-6028
dc.identifier.issn1613-9674
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00569-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6539
dc.description.abstractObjectives To perform a detailed analysis of palatal process pneumatization (PPP) on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods This study consisted of 376 maxillary sinuses of 188 patients aged 22-88 years who had maxillary CBCT scans. The radioanatomy of the PPP was evaluated at distances 4, 8, 16, and 24 mm posterior to incisive foramen. The types of PPP were classified as follows: type I: maxillary sinus palatal process non-gasified; type II: palatal process gasification into the nasal floor, but not more than half of the width of the nasal floor; and type III: palatal process gasification into the nasal floor more than half of the width of nasal floor. Sinus opening angle (SOA), palatonasal recess angle (PNRA), palatal junction angle (PJA), and palatal depth measurement (PDM) were the evaluated parameters. Results Among the identified 1315 PPPs, type I PPP (880, 66.92%) was the most frequently observed, followed by type II (426, 32.4%), and the least observed was type III PPP (9, 0.68%). There was no significant difference between SOA and PJA according to the types of PPP (p > 0.05). The difference between PNRA and PDM of type I and type II PPP showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Type I PPP was the most encountered with the highest PDM, and PNRA was narrower in type III than in type II PPP. Conclusion Physicians must be aware of these variations to prevent possible complications during surgery because 33.08% of the maxillary sinuses showed extensive pneumatization through the palatal process.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic imagingen_US
dc.subjectMaxillary sinusen_US
dc.subjectPalateen_US
dc.titleRadioanatomic study of maxillary sinus palatal process pneumatizationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAydın, Emine Zehra
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11282-021-00569-9en_US
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage398en_US
dc.identifier.endpage404en_US
dc.relation.journalOral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster