Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGümrükçü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.authorBayramoğlu, Zeynep
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-05T06:46:31Z
dc.date.available2024-11-05T06:46:31Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationGümrükçü, Z., Balaban, E., & Bayramoğlu, Z. (2024). Biomechanical evaluation of six zygomatic implants versus four zygomatic implants combined with dental implants in the treatment of different maxillary defects. BMC Oral Health, 24(1), 1230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05031-wen_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05031-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/9709
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aims to compare the biomechanics of six zygomatic implants (ZIs) and dental implants (DIs) combined with four ZIs with different maxilla defects. Methods: Three-dimensional constructs of the ZIs, DIs human skulls, and maxillary prostheses were created using SolidWorks Software (Version 2015, Dassault Systems SolidWorks Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Eight finite element models of the skull with four different alveolar defect types (0–4) were constructed. Type 0: No defect; Type 1: Bilateral posterior defects; Type 2: Right posterior defect; Type 3: Anterior and left posterior defects; Type 4: Bilateral posterior and anterior defects. In two models with the same defect type (for defect types 0–2), six ZIs or two DIs combined with four ZIs were inserted into the maxilla. Six ZIs were inserted in the maxilla models with defect types 3 and 4. Vertical (150 N) and masseteric (300 N) loads were simulated on the prosthesis. The maximum Von Mises stress in the implants/surrounding bone and bone deformation were evaluated. Results: The maximum Von Mises stresses in bone/implant were found highest in the defect type 2 model with four ZIs combined with two DIs. The lowest maximum Von Mises stress for bone was detected in the model with defect type 0 and with six ZIs. Conclusion: Among the four types of defects, the posterior unilateral defect caused the highest stress value.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar defecten_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectQuad zygomatic implanten_US
dc.subjectSix zygomatic implantsen_US
dc.subjectZygomatic implanten_US
dc.titleBiomechanical evaluation of six zygomatic implants versus four zygomatic implants combined with dental implants in the treatment of different maxillary defectsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGümrükçü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBalaban, Emre
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-024-05031-wen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-024-05031-wen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1230en_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster