• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Performance comparison of PVDF-based unimodal and bimodal electret air filters via solution-blowing and electro-blowing methods

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (1.460Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Date

2025

Author

Çalışır, Mehmet Durmuş

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Calisir, M. D. (2025). Performance Comparison of PVDF‐Based Unimodal and Bimodal Electret Air Filters via Solution‐Blowing and Electro‐Blowing Methods. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.56855

Abstract

In this study, unimodal and bimodal PVDF nano/micro-fibrous filter mats are produced using electro-blowing (EB) and solution-blowing (SB) techniques. Fiber diameters are controlled by adjusting solution concentrations (10 and 20 wt%) and applying an electric field. Nanofibers from low-concentration solutions using EB averaged 236 nm, while fibers from high-concentration solutions via SB reached around 1 mu m. Both methods result in fiber bundles, with EB forming finer bundles and SB producing thicker ones. Defects such as droplets and beads are observed in SB, decreasing with the electric field and lower solution concentration. Bimodal mats show fiber distributions centered around 250 nm and 1 mu m. FTIR analysis reveals similar crystallization, with all samples dominated by the beta-phase and finer nanofibers increasing peak intensities. Filtration tests for PM0.3 at 15.83 cm/s show Sample A (EB) achieves the highest efficiency (95.95%) but also the highest resistance (250.33 Pa). Among bimodal samples, four-layered ABAB mats show the best quality factor (QF) with 84.67% efficiency and 145.25 Pa pressure drop, while Sample A + B achieves 88.24% efficiency with a lower pressure drop (169.50 Pa). Corona discharge treatment enhances filtration efficiency, with the sample ABAB reaching 94.55% efficiency and a 151.83 Pa pressure drop after treatment.

Source

Journal of Applied Polymer Science

URI

https://doi.org/10.1002/app.56855
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/10057

Collections

  • MÜF, Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği Bölümü Koleksiyonu [197]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.