Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Onur
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Zeynep Sağnak
dc.contributor.authorBalaban, Emre
dc.contributor.authorÇandırlı, Celal
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:32:28Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:32:28Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationYilmaz, O., Sagnak Yilmaz, Z., Balaban, E., & Candirli, C. (2020). Management of Recurrence of Ameloblastoma and Odontogenic Keratocyst: A Cross-Sectional Study. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 22(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2020.41564en_US
dc.identifier.issn1659-1046
dc.identifier.issn2215-3411
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.15517/IJDS.2020.41564
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/1027
dc.descriptionYILMAZ, Onur/0000-0002-0460-7649; Yilmaz, Zeynep Sagnak/0000-0002-3225-2486en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000560071200021en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) and ameloblastoma are slowly growing and locally invasive tumors with high recurrence rate. the aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of recurrent ameloblastoma and OKC cases, and evaluate outcomes of our treatments in terms of recurrence. Material and Methods: A total of 23 patients with confirmed recurrent ameloblastoma or OKC and treated in our clinic within eleven years period were reviewed retrospectively. Results: Eleven recurrent OKC cases and twelve recurrent ameloblastoma cases were included. Most recurrences occurred within five years after the initial treatment (69.6%). Enucleation had the highest recurrence rate among the first treatments (18/23). All recurrences were located in the mandible, with one exception (22/23). All recurrent OKCs were multilocular. Different histopathologic subtypes of ameloblastoma were seen in our study, follicular ameloblastoma was the most common (8/12). the mean diameter of the lesions was 4.3 cm (ranging from 2 cm to 7 cm). Statically significant relation was found between location and diameter of lesion and year of recurrence onset (p=0.004; p=0.026). We performed radical treatments in these cases (ten patients underwent marginal resections, and thirteen patients underwent segmental resection), and no recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Previous inadequate surgical procedures were the most important cause of recurrence. Marginal or segmental resection with safety margins is the best method to treat recurrences of OKC or ameloblastoma cases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniv Costa Rica, Fac Odontologiaen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectOdontogenic tumoursen_US
dc.subjectOdontogenic cystsen_US
dc.subjectRecurrenceen_US
dc.subjectConservative treatmenten_US
dc.subjectMargins of excisionen_US
dc.subjectResectionen_US
dc.titleManagement of recurrence of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst: A cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBalaban, Emre
dc.identifier.doi10.15517/IJDS.2020.41564
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage174en_US
dc.identifier.endpage186en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalOdovtos International Journal of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record