• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Are technological contributions in behavior guidance techniques superior to conventional methods?: Effects on dental anxiety and pain perception

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (1.763Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2025

Author

Yazar, Mücella
Aydınoğlu, Sema
Günaçar, Dilara Nil

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Yazar, M., Aydınoğlu, S., & Günaçar, D. N. (2025). Are technological contributions in behavior guidance techniques superior to conventional methods?: Effects on dental anxiety and pain perception. BMC oral health, 25(1), 735. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06139-3

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effects of three different behavior guidance methods on children’s dental anxiety levels and pain perception. Methods: This study included 63 children aged 6–8 years who required pulpotomy and were divided into three groups: tell–show–do (TSD; Group 1), TSD with video modeling (Group 2), and TSD with mobile phone application (Group 3). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SPO2) of the participants were recorded before the procedure, after local anesthesia, after pulpotomy, and after the end of the procedure. Faces Version of the Modified Child Dental Anxiety (MCDASf), Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS), and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) pain scales were applied. Chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, Friedman’s test, and repeated measurement analysis statistical tests were used. Results: No significant difference was found between the steps in terms of BP, HR, and SPO2 within the groups (p > 0.05). When comparing the groups, there were significant differences in SBP (p = 0.040) and DBP (p = 0.027) measured at the beginning and end of the procedure, and between MCDASf (p = 0.041) and WBFPRS (p = 0.013) scores. These values ​​were lower in Group 3. Conclusion: Dental anxiety and pain perception scores were lowest when using TSD with mobile phone application (Group 3). In line with developing technology, the use of mobile phone applications in pediatric dentistry can contribute to more harmonious treatment management in children.

Source

BMC Oral Health

Volume

25

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06139-3
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/10433

Collections

  • DŞHF, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Koleksiyonu [253]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5990]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.