• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of bedside adequacy assessment in thyroid cytology on cytological sufficiency and the final histopathological diagnosis

Thumbnail

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (297.6Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2020

Author

Toyran, Tuğba
Güvendi, Gülname Fındık
Adalı, Yasemen
Üstün, Hüseyin

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Toyran, T., Güvendi, G.F., Adalı, Y. & Üstün, H. (2020). Effects of bedside adequacy assessment in thyroid cytology on cytological sufficiency and the final histopathological diagnosis. Cukurova Medical Journal, 45(3), 1173-1181. https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.733150

Abstract

Purpose: the thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a fast, reliable, and economical method for interpretation of thyroid nodules. This method contributes to the later management of patients and reduces unnecessary surgical interventions. This study aimed to demonstrate the contribution of bedside adequacy assessment during FNAC to the accuracy rates of cytological competence and final histological diagnosis. Materials and Methods: the study included 443 patients who underwent FNAC in a university hospital between 2012 and 2015. Correlations between the histological diagnosis categories of patients who had and who did not have bedside adequacy assessment were compared per sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy. Results: As a result of comparison of cytological and histopathological diagnoses, 30.7% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 50% positive predictive value, 57.1% negative predictive value and 55.1% diagnostic accuracy were found in the group with bedside adequacy assesment. Whereas the group without bedside adequacy assessment, 50% sensitivity, 69.2% specificity, 42.8% positive predictive value, 75% negative predictive value, and 63.1% 1% diagnostic were found Conclusion: Bedside adequacy assessment increases the cytological adequacy proportion, but does not contribute to the diagnostic accuracy rate.

Source

Cukurova Medical Journal

Volume

45

Issue

3

URI

https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.733150
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/1261

Collections

  • TF, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [1224]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.