Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzdemir, Hatice
dc.contributor.authorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:40:29Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:40:29Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationÖzdemir, H., & Duymus, Z. Y. (2019). The Effect of Laboratory Procedures and Repeated-glazing on Color of Metal-ceramic Restoration. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 10(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18en_US
dc.identifier.issn0976-237X
dc.identifier.issn0976-2361
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/1553
dc.descriptionWOS: 000514103600011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32308284en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: the aim of this study was to determine the color changes of MCRs after routine laboratory procedures and then glazed for 1, 2, and 3 times. Materials and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped (10-mm diameter and 1-mm thickness) specimens were fabricated from Cr-Co metal-alloy. Bonding agent, first and second layer of shade A(2)opaque porcelain (OP) were applied on the metal specimens. the color of specimens was measured with a spectrophotometer after each procedure and Delta E-1, Delta E-2,and Delta E-3 values were calculated. Shade A(2) feldspathic porcelain was applied (2-mm thickness) to all specimens. Glaze was applied on the porcelain for 1, 2, and 3 times and then, the color measured after each procedure and Delta E-4, Delta E-5, and Delta E-6 values were calculated. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan test (P < 0.05). Results: Delta E-1 that was obtained between the first layer of OP and bonding agent showed the greatest value. Delta E-2 that was obtained between the second and first layer of OP showed the lowest value. After repeated glazed procedures, the final color of the specimens was changed; but, these changes were clinically acceptable (Delta E < 5.5). Conclusions: the routine laboratory procedures and glazed for 1,2, and 3 times is effect the color of MCRs; but, the color changes were clinically acceptable (Delta E < 5.5).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectColor changeen_US
dc.subjectGlazeen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory proceduresen_US
dc.subjectMetal-ceramic restorationen_US
dc.titleThe effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restorationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage239en_US
dc.identifier.endpage242en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalContemporary Clinical Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster