dc.contributor.author | Özdemir, Hatice | |
dc.contributor.author | Duymuş, Zeynep Yeşil | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-19T19:40:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-19T19:40:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Özdemir, H., & Duymus, Z. Y. (2019). The Effect of Laboratory Procedures and Repeated-glazing on Color of Metal-ceramic Restoration. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 10(2), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0976-237X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0976-2361 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11436/1553 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000514103600011 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 32308284 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed effect the final color of metal-ceramic restorations (MCRs). Clinicians wonder if the color changes after routine laboratory procedures and repeated glazed is clinically acceptable or not. Aims: the aim of this study was to determine the color changes of MCRs after routine laboratory procedures and then glazed for 1, 2, and 3 times. Materials and Methods: Forty-five disc-shaped (10-mm diameter and 1-mm thickness) specimens were fabricated from Cr-Co metal-alloy. Bonding agent, first and second layer of shade A(2)opaque porcelain (OP) were applied on the metal specimens. the color of specimens was measured with a spectrophotometer after each procedure and Delta E-1, Delta E-2,and Delta E-3 values were calculated. Shade A(2) feldspathic porcelain was applied (2-mm thickness) to all specimens. Glaze was applied on the porcelain for 1, 2, and 3 times and then, the color measured after each procedure and Delta E-4, Delta E-5, and Delta E-6 values were calculated. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Duncan test (P < 0.05). Results: Delta E-1 that was obtained between the first layer of OP and bonding agent showed the greatest value. Delta E-2 that was obtained between the second and first layer of OP showed the lowest value. After repeated glazed procedures, the final color of the specimens was changed; but, these changes were clinically acceptable (Delta E < 5.5). Conclusions: the routine laboratory procedures and glazed for 1,2, and 3 times is effect the color of MCRs; but, the color changes were clinically acceptable (Delta E < 5.5). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Color change | en_US |
dc.subject | Glaze | en_US |
dc.subject | Laboratory procedures | en_US |
dc.subject | Metal-ceramic restoration | en_US |
dc.title | The effect of laboratory procedures and repeated-glazing on color of metal-ceramic restoration | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | RTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | en_US |
dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Duymuş, Zeynep Yeşil | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4103/ccd.ccd_411_18 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 239 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 242 | en_US |
dc.ri.edit | oa | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |