• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Total scalp irradiation: the comparison of five different plans using volumetric modulated arc therapy-simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT-SIB) technique

Thumbnail

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (357.3Kb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2017

Author

Yılmaz Rakıcı, Sema
Çınar, Yunus
Eren, Mehmet

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Yılmaz Rakıcı, S., Çınar, S. & Eren, M. (2017). Total Scalp Irradiation: The Comparison of Five Different Plans Using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy-Simultaneous Integrated Boost (VMAT-SIB) Technique. Turk Onkoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Oncology, 32(3), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjo.2017.1609

Abstract

OBJECTIVE the aim of this study was to show that the optimum dosage can be delivered to the target organs at risk (OAR) by radiotherapy, which becomes more complicated because of technical difficulties arising from irregular, convex, and complex geometrical structure of the target, such as scalp irradiation, and because of situations resulting from the necessity of bolus of the lesion and immobilization as well as the proximity to neighboring critical organs using the VMAT-SIB technique. METHODS Five different VMAT-SIB schemes were designed using the Varian Trilogy IX linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems) for total scalp irradiation and bilateral neck irradiation. These different VMAT scehemes were compared with respect to a dose volume histogram of obtained data, homogeneity, indices, conformity index, OAR, and doses of target volumes. RESULTS the patient-designed bolus plan 1 with two isocenters was chosen as the most appropriate plan. Plans 2, 3, 4, and 5 were inappropriate plans because the application of the virtual bolus in plan 2 was difficult, plan 3 with one isocenter was unacceptable with respect to the value of conformity index, plan 4 with three isocenters had a matching field, and plan 5 in which different priority values were used had an increase in OAR doses. CONCLUSION VMAT-SIB can be preferred as an appropriate radiotherapy technique as it can provide optimum and allowable OAR doses in tumors requiring an intensive treatment planning effort.

Source

Turk Onkoloji Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Oncology

Volume

32

Issue

3

URI

https://doi.org/10.5505/tjo.2017.1609
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/2220

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5931]
  • TF, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [1559]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2844]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.