Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZorba, Orhan Ünal
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Hakkı
dc.contributor.authorAkça, Görkem
dc.contributor.authorYazar, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:49:40Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:49:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationZorba, O. Ü., Uzun, H., Akça, G., & Yazar, S. (2017). The Effect of Different Metabolic Syndrome: Definitions on the Relationship Between Metabolic Syndrome and LUTS in Men With Benign Prostatic Enlargement. American journal of men's health, 11(1), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316638654en_US
dc.identifier.issn1557-9883
dc.identifier.issn1557-9891
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1557988316638654
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/2320
dc.descriptionWOS: 000391542300018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26993995en_US
dc.description.abstractBecause various criteria are used to define metabolic syndrome (MetS), this study examines the most relevant definition for patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Most studies regarding the link between MetS and BPE/ lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) have used the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria for diagnosis, while a few have used criteria from the International Diabetes Federation and/or American Heart Association. Patients with LUTS due to BPE are classified as having MetS or not by the aforementioned three definitions. Prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score, storage and voiding subscores, maximum urinary flow rate, and the postvoid urine of patients with and without MetS were compared separately in the three different groups. Surgical and medical treatment prevalence was also compared between three groups. No matter which definition was used, the International Prostate Symptom Score, the storage and voiding symptom scores, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, and postvoid urine were significantly higher in the patients with MetS. the maximum urinary flow rate was similar between patients with and without MetS, according to all three different definitions. There was no significant difference in the aforementioned parameter between patients with MetS diagnosed with the three different definitions. Irrespective of which definition was used, the surgical treatment rate was not significantly different in patients diagnosed with than without MetS, or between the patients with MetS diagnosed with the three different definitions. the authors suggest that it does not matter which of the aforementioned three definitions is used during the evaluation of MetS in men with BPE/LUTS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBenign prostatic enlargementen_US
dc.subjectLower urinary tract symptomsen_US
dc.subjectMetabolic syndromeen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different metabolic syndrome: Definitions on the relationship between metabolic syndrome and LUTS in men with benign prostatic enlargementen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorZorba, Orhan Ünal
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUzun, Hakkı
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAkça, Görkem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYazar, Selim
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1557988316638654
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage158en_US
dc.identifier.endpage163en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Mens Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster