Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAlkurt, Murat
dc.contributor.authorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.contributor.authorDedeoğlu, Numan
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:50:12Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAlkurt, M., Duymus, Z.Y., Dedeoglu, N. (2016). Investigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 8(5), 380-387. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/2396
dc.descriptionALKURT, MURAT/0000-0001-9324-0158en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000387529500007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27826388en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. the storage conditions of impressions affect the dimensional accuracy of the impression materials. the aim of the study was to assess the effects of storage time on dimensional accuracy of five different impression materials by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Polyether (Impregum), hydrocolloid (Hydrogum and Alginoplast), and silicone (Zetaflow and Honigum) impression materials were used for impressions taken from an acrylic master model. the impressions were poured and subjected to four different storage times: immediate use, and 1, 3, and 5 days of storage. Line 1 (between right and left first molar mesiobuccal cusp tips) and Line 2 (between right and left canine tips) were measured on a CBCT scanned model, and time dependent mean differences were analyzed by two-way univariate and Duncan's test (alpha=.05). RESULTS. For Line 1, the total mean difference of Impregum and Hydrogum were statistically different from Alginoplast (P<.05), while Zetaflow and Honigum had smaller discrepancies. Alginoplast resulted in more difference than the other impressions (P<.05). For Line 2, the total mean difference of Impregum was statistically different from the other impressions. Significant differences were observed in Line 1 and Line 2 for the different storage periods (P<.05). CONCLUSION. the dimensional accuracy of impression material is clinically acceptable if the impression material is stored in suitable conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectImpression materialsen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.titleInvestigation of the effects of storage time on the dimensional accuracy of impression materials using cone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAlkurt, Murat
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.380
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage380en_US
dc.identifier.endpage387en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster