Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYalçın, Yasin
dc.contributor.authorUrsavaş, Ömer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorKlein, James D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T08:05:03Z
dc.date.available2022-09-29T08:05:03Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationYalcin, Y., Ursavas, O.F. & Klein, J.D. (2021). Measuring instructional design competencies of future professionals: construct validity of the ibstpi(R) standards. Educational Technology Research and Development , 69(3), 1701-1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10006-7en_US
dc.identifier.issn1042-1629
dc.identifier.issn1556-6501
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10006-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6591
dc.description.abstractCompetencies that constitute the instructional design profession and how these competencies should be measured have been of interest to researchers for many years. Among the competency sets developed to date, the ibstpi(R) instructional designer competencies have been widely used by researchers, practitioners, educational programs, and employers in the field of Instructional Design and Technology. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the ibstpi(R) instructional design competency set could be used as a self-report instrument to measure instructional design competencies. For this purpose, we assigned a five-point scale to the ibstpi(R) competency set and investigated the construct validity of the resulting instrument by administering it to a sample of future professionals. We used a robust method to translate the competency set into Turkish and recruited 820 junior and senior students who were enrolled in a degree program in Computer Education and Instructional Technology in Turkey. The conceptual framework of the competency set was used to develop three models to be tested via a series of Confirmatory Factor Analysis. All three models showed a good fit to the data and factors had above satisfactory internal consistency reliability and convergent validity. Although the factors in three models did not show a perfect discriminant validity, we argue that the instrument can be used to measure instructional design competencies. Discussion and implications of the findings areen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInstructional designen_US
dc.subjectCompetencyen_US
dc.subjectMeasurementen_US
dc.subjectConstruct validityen_US
dc.subjectIbstpien_US
dc.titleMeasuring instructional design competencies of future professionals: construct validity of the ibstpi(R) standardsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYalçın, Yasin
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUrsavaş, Ömer Faruk
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11423-021-10006-7en_US
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1701en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1727en_US
dc.relation.journalEducational Technology Research and Developmenten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster