Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCeryan, Nurcihan
dc.contributor.authorÖzkat, Erkan Caner
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz Can, Nuriye
dc.contributor.authorCeryan, Şener
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T05:41:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T05:41:13Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationCeryan, N., Ozkat, E.C., Korkmaz Can, N. & Ceryan, S. (2021). Machine learning models to estimate the elastic modulus of weathered magmatic rocks. Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(12), 448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09738-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1866-6280
dc.identifier.issn1866-6299
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09738-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6651
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, several soft computing models have been proposed to estimate the elastic modulus of magmatic rocks. However, there are lacks in models that consider the different weathering degrees in determining the elastic modulus of rocks. In the literature, mechanical properties are widely used as inputs in predictive models for weathered rocks; however, there are only a few models that use index properties representing the effect of weathering on magmatic rocks. In this study, support vector regression (SVR) Gaussian process regression (GPR), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were developed to predict the elastic modulus of magmatic rocks with different degrees of weathering. The inputs selected by the best subset regression approach were porosity, P-wave velocity, and slake durability index. Key performance indicators (KPIs) were computed to validate the accuracy of the developed models. In addition to KPIs, Taylor diagrams and regression error characteristic (REC) curves were used to assess the performance of the developed prediction models. In this study, considering the difficulties of expressing the error using only RMSE and MAE, a new performance index (PI), PIMAE, was proposed using normalized MAE instead of normalized RMSE. It was also indicated that PIRMSE and PIMAE should be used together in performance analysis. When considering the Taylor diagram, PIRMSE, and PIMAE, the GPR models performed best, and the SVR model performed the worst in both the training and test periods. Similarly, according to the REC curve in both periods, the performance of the SVR was the worst, while the performance of the ANN model was the best. The PIRMSE and PIMAE values of the GPR model for the test data were 1.3779 and 1.4142, respectively, and they were 1.2567 and 1.4139, respectively, for the ANN model. According to the computed response surfaces, an increase in the P-wave velocity, and a decrease in the porosity increased the elastic modulus. However, changes in slake durability index only had a minor effect on the elastic modulus.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElastic modulusen_US
dc.subjectWeathered magmatic rocksen_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectPorosityen_US
dc.subjectP-wave velocityen_US
dc.subjectSlake durability indexen_US
dc.titleMachine learning models to estimate the elastic modulus of weathered magmatic rocksen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzkat, Erkan Caner
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12665-021-09738-9en_US
dc.identifier.volume80en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage448en_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster