Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Işıl
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, İpek
dc.contributor.authorDuymus, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-10T08:46:00Z
dc.date.available2022-11-10T08:46:00Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationOzturk, I., Caglar, I., & Duymus, Z. Y. (2022). The effect of adjustment and finishing procedure on roughness, strength, and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. Clinical oral investigations, 26(7), 4761–4768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04440-xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04440-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6960
dc.description.abstractObjective To evaluate the effect of adjustment and finishing procedures and thermal aging of monolithic zirconia on the surface roughness, phase transformation, and flexural strength. Material and methods One hundred disk-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups: control, received only glazing; group Gr, was grinded; group GrP, was grinded and polished; group GrG, was grinded and re-glazed; group GrPG, was re-glazed after grinding and polishing. Half of the each group were stored in distilled water for 24 h and the remaining were thermocycled for 5000 cycles. Topographic evaluations were done with profilometer and scanning electron microscope. Phase changes were assessed through X-ray diffractometer. The biaxial flexural strength test was calculated by universal test machine. Statistical analysis was performed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). Results Group Gr showed statistically higher surface roughness and flexural strength values than the other groups (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between finishing groups (p >0.05). Phase transformation was occurred in all groups but the differences were not statically significant (p >0.05). Artificial aging had no effect on surface roughness, flexural strength, and phase transformation (p >0.05). Conclusion Surface roughness significantly increased after grinding, but finishing procedure approximated it to the control group. Glazing after grinding decreased the flexural strength, but polishing did not. Zirconia polishing system may be an alternative to re-glazing for monolithic zirconia.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGrindingen_US
dc.subjectMonolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.subjectPolishingen_US
dc.subjectPhase transformationen_US
dc.subjectBiaxial flexural strengthen_US
dc.titleThe effect of adjustment and finishing procedure on roughness, strength, and phase transformation of monolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖztürk, Işıl
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇağlar, İpek
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-022-04440-xen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4761en_US
dc.identifier.endpage4768en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Oral Investigationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster