Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCirit, Osman Sezen
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Esvet
dc.contributor.authorSancak, Banu
dc.contributor.authorKocagöz, Tanıl
dc.contributor.authorCan, Özge
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Candan
dc.contributor.authorSayıner, Ayça Arzu
dc.contributor.authorAppak, Özgür
dc.contributor.authorUyar, Neval Yurttutan
dc.contributor.authorKülah, Canan
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Ayşegül Çopur
dc.contributor.authorÖzgümüş, Osman Birol
dc.contributor.authorAltıntop, Yasemin Ay
dc.contributor.authorSaatçi, Esma
dc.contributor.authorKarslıgil, Tekin
dc.contributor.authorZer, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, Nevgün Sepin
dc.contributor.authorÇekin, Yeşim
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Zeynep Ceren
dc.contributor.authorEvren, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKarakoç, Ayşe Esra
dc.contributor.authorOrhan, Sultan Gülbahçe
dc.contributor.authorMutlu, Derya
dc.contributor.authorBozdemir, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorÇaycı, Yeliz Tanrıverdi
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Canberk
dc.contributor.authorTaşbakan, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorMert, Merve
dc.contributor.authorÇınar, Ece
dc.contributor.authorKutlusoy, Oya Özlem Eren
dc.contributor.authorKocagöz, Sesin
dc.contributor.authorErtürk, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, İlhami
dc.contributor.authorMete, Ayşe Özlem
dc.contributor.authorEneyli, Müge Günalp
dc.contributor.authorAkdemir, İrem
dc.contributor.authorKarakök, Taliha
dc.contributor.authorİnan, Dilara
dc.contributor.authorAtilla, Aynur
dc.contributor.authorTaflan, Şevket Onur
dc.contributor.authorYörük, Kağan Etka
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-27T15:30:34Z
dc.date.available2022-11-27T15:30:34Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationCirit, O. S., Mutlu, E., Sancak, B., Kocagöz, T., Can, Ö., Çicek, C., Arzu Sayiner, A., Appak, Ö., Uyar, N. Y., Külah, C., Çiçek, A. Ç., Özgümüs, O. B., Ay Altintop, Y., Saatçi, E., Karsligil, T., Zer, Y., Özen, N. S., Çekin, Y., Karahan, Z. C., Evren, E., … Yörük, K. E. (2022). Comparison of a novel antigen detection test with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Infection, 1–6. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01832-9en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0300-8126
dc.identifier.issn1439-0973
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01832-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/7159
dc.description.abstractMolecular diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory specimens is considered the gold standard method. This method is highly sensitive and specific but it has some limitations such as being expensive and requiring special laboratory equipment and skilled personnel. RapidFor (TM) Antigen Rapid Test Kit is a commercially available Ag-RDT which is produced in Turkey and designed to detect the nucleocapsid antigen of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swab samples. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of this novel SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection considering the RT-PCR method as the gold standard. Four hundred forty-four nasopharyngeal swab samples which were collected from the patients who met clinical criteria of COVID-19 from ten centers in Turkey between September 2020 and February 2021 were included in the study. All the nasopharyngeal swab samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using commercial RT-PCR kits (Bioeksen and A1 Lifesciences, Istanbul, Turkey) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Viral loads were assessed according to the cycle threshold (Ct) values. RapidFor (TM) SARS-CoV-2 antigen test (Vitrosens Biotechnology, Istanbul, Turkey) was used to investigate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antigen in all samples following the manufacturer's instructions. Out of 444 nasopharyngeal swab samples tested, 346 (77.9%) were positive and 98 (22.1%) were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RTPCR. Overall sensitivity of the RapidFor (TM). Antigen Rapid Test Kit was 80.3% whereas specificity was found to be 87.8%. Positivity rate of rapid antigen test in samples with Ct values over 25 and below 30 was 82.7%, while it increased to 95.7% in samples 20 <= Ct < 25 and reached 100% in samples with Ct values below 20. RapidFor (TM) SARS-CoV-2 Ag test might be a good choice in the screening of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and their contacts for taking isolation measures early, with advantages over RT-PCR as being rapid, easy and being applicable in every laboratory and even at point of care.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectNasopharyngeal swab samplesen_US
dc.subjectRapid antigen testen_US
dc.subjectRT-PCRen_US
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en_US
dc.titleComparison of a novel antigen detection test with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for laboratory diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infectionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇiçek, Ayşegül Çopur
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzgümüş, Osman Birol
dc.contributor.institutionauthorErtürk, Ayşe
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s15010-022-01832-9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage6en_US
dc.relation.journalInfectionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası - Editör Denetimli Dergi - Başka Kurum Yazarıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster