• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparison of endoloop and Hem-o-lok clip for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: which one is more cost-effective. A retrospective study

Thumbnail

View/Open

Full Text / Tam Metin (1.784Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2022

Author

Uyan, Mikail
Acehan, Türker
Karakaya, Ahmet
Kalcan, Süleyman
Özdemır, Ali
Tomas, Kadir

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Uyan, M., Acehan, T., Karakaya, A., Kalcan, S., Özdemir, A. & Tomas, K. (2022). Comparison of endoloop and Hem-o-lok clip for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: which one is more cost-effective. A retrospective study. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 39(2), 492-496. http://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.39.2.36

Abstract

We aimed to show the effect of closure of the appendix stump with different methods during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), on postoperative complications, healing process and costs. Patients who underwent LA due to acute appendicitis in the last 5 years in Rize were retrospectively analyzed. Our study includes comparative analysis on two patient groups in which we carried LA. We used endoloop (EL) in Group 1 and hem-o-lok polymeric clip (HC) in Group 2 to close the appendix stump. Patients were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, preoperative white blood cell and C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation, whether a drain was used, appendix diameter, pathological diagnosis, postoperative complications, duration of surgery and length of stay, and cost. Of 209 patients, 111 (51.2%) were male and 98 (48.8%) were female. The frequency of drain placement was higher in Group 2 (P = 0.005). No stump leakage was observed in either group, but the incidence of other postoperative complications was significantly higher in the EL group (P=0.041). The use of HC is cheaper than the use of EL. There was no significant difference in other parameters. Both EL and HC are used safely in LA. Although both methods do not have obvious advantages over each other, HC stands out one step further due to its more affordable cost and less possibility of postoperative complications.

Source

Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)

Volume

39

Issue

2

URI

http://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.39.2.36
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/omujecm/issue/68947/1032972
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/7354

Collections

  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6011]
  • TF, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu [1223]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.