Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKoca, Cansu Gül
dc.contributor.authorGümrükçü, Zeynep
dc.contributor.authorBilgir, Elif
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T10:19:24Z
dc.date.available2020-08-05T10:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/846
dc.identifier.urihttps://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=MarkedList&qid=15&SID=D4n5PeymPalqpAoiZNY&page=1&doc=2&colName=WOS
dc.description.abstractAlthough magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps to clearly visualize the disorders in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the relationship between cross-sectional and clinical findings has not been precisely established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical symptoms and MRI findings in individuals with TMJ pain. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional study, conducted on the clinical and MRI findings of the patients, who applied to Uşak University, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic with TMJ pain between the years 2016- 2019. The primary predictor variables were MRI findings; disc position (normal, disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR)), disc structural distortion (normal, folded, lengthened, round, biconvex, thick), condyle degeneration type (normal, moderate, severe) and joint effusion (JE) (absent, present). The primary outcome variable was pain, recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) (numbered between 0-10). The other variables were demographic variables (age/gender). The relationship between clinical and MRI findings were statistically evaluated. The data were analysed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. Chisquare (x2 ) test was used for categorical variable comparisons. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Clinical and MRI records of 700 TMJ, from 350 patients with the mean age of the 31 (12-65) were evaluated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found between; disc position and pain, disc position and JE; JE and pain; disc structural distortion and pain; and disc structural distortion and disc position. JE was seen more common in DDWOR group. The most common disc distortion, seen in patients with JE, is the folded type.Conclusions: The present study can infer that pain is associated with disc position, JE, disc structural distortion, and DDWOR is associated with JE. Folded type disc is the most common disc type in TMJ with JE. Key words: Internal derangement, TMJ, MRI evaluation, disc morphology, disc position, condyle degeneration, joint effusion.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMed Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucalen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectInternal derangementen_US
dc.subjectTMJen_US
dc.subjectMRI evaluationen_US
dc.subjectdisc morphologyen_US
dc.subjectdisc positionen_US
dc.subjectcondyle degenerationen_US
dc.subjectjoint effusionen_US
dc.titleDoes clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.department0-Belirleneceken_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthor0-Belirlenecek
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster