Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKolaylı, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorBirinci, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorKanbur, Esra Demir
dc.contributor.authorUçurum, Özgül
dc.contributor.authorKara, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorTakma, Çiğdem
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-08T12:06:26Z
dc.date.available2024-02-08T12:06:26Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationKolaylı, S., Birinci, C., Kanbur, E.D., Uçurum, Ö., Kara, Y. & Takma, Ç. (2023). Comparison of biochemical and nutritional properties of bee pollen samples according to botanical differences. European Food Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04428-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn1438-2377
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04428-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/8745
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Bee pollen is a well-balanced food and food supplement whose nutritional and bioactive properties vary according to its botanical origin. This comparative study examined some nutritional and biochemical properties of the various types of bee pollen samples collected from Anatolian region. Eleven samples were examined based on melissopalynological analyses, including five unifloral types (chestnut, rhododendron, buckwheat, ivy, and rose), and six different multifloral samples. Crude protein, edible fiber, sugar (fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose), and essential elements (Na, K. Ca, Mg, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn) were evaluated for chemical characterization. Twenty-five phenolic components were analyzed using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC–PDA). Total phenolic compounds, total flavonoids, ferric reducing antioxidant capacity (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity were measured as antioxidant determinants. The results were subjected to statistical analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to determine differences between pollen samples. Chrysin, t-cinnamic acid, and pinocembrin were identified as common components in all samples, but in varying amounts. Bee pollens’ nutrients and phenolic compositions, thus, varied according to their botanical properties, although chestnut pollen exhibited the greatest antioxidant capacity. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Linken_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBee pollenen_US
dc.subjectCrude proteinen_US
dc.subjectFiberen_US
dc.subjectMineralen_US
dc.subjectPhenolicen_US
dc.titleComparison of biochemical and nutritional properties of bee pollen samples according to botanical differencesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Fen - Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKanbur, Esra Demir
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00217-023-04428-1en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Food Research and Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster