• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   RTEÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Removal efficiency of a fast setting pozzalan-based bioactive cement: a micro CT study

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (1.331Mb)

Access

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Date

2024

Author

Çetinkaya, Feyza
Çıkman, Ahter Şanal
Keleş, Ali
Arıcıoğlu, Banu

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Çetinkaya, F., Çıkman, A. Ş., Keleş, A., & Arıcıoğlu, B. (2024). Removal efficiency of a fast setting pozzalan-based bioactive cement: a micro CT study. BMC oral health, 24(1), 778. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04546-6

Abstract

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of PRMTA and ECMPremixed applied to the coronal third according to the RET by UI and to examine the effect of different solutions on material removal. Materials and methods40 permanent upper central teeth were used to simulate immature teeth. The samples were irrigated with 1.5% NaOCl and calcium hydroxide was placed. Samples were incubated in PBS. Then irrigation was done with 17% EDTA, the samples were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 20):Group 1: PRMTA, Group 2: ECM Premixed. The materials were placed in the samples. Then the samples were scanned with micro-CT. Materials were removed by UI. Micro-CT scan of the samples was performed. Each material group was divided into 2 subgroups (n = 10): Group1 was MTAD, group2 was irrigated with 10% CA; then micro-CT was performed. Obtained images were positioned in DataViewer and analyzed with CTAn. The obtained data were statistically analyzed in IBM SPSS 25. The significance level was determined as 5%. ResultsThere was no significant difference between the initial volumes of the materials (p > 0.05). The amount of the remaining material after UI was significantly higher in the PRMTA (0.7471%) group compared to the ECM Premixed (0.0093%). There was no significant difference in terms of remaining material after irrigation with MTAD and CA in both groups (p > 0.05). ConclusionA great deal of the materials were removed by UI under the operation microscope. ECM Premixed was removed more effectively compared to the PRMTA. And, acidic solutions did not provide any additional benefit in material removal.

Source

BMC Oral Health

Volume

24

Issue

1

URI

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04546-6
https://hdl.handle.net/11436/9212

Collections

  • DŞHF, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Koleksiyonu [254]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [2443]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6032]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [5260]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@RTEÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University || OAI-PMH ||

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@RTEÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.