Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKolaylı, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorPalabıyık, İsmail Murat
dc.contributor.authorAtik, Didem Sözeri
dc.contributor.authorKeskin, Merve
dc.contributor.authorBozdeveci, Arif
dc.contributor.authorKaraoğlu, Şengül Alpay
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:29:30Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:29:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationS. Kolayli, S. Kolayli, I. Palabiyik, I. Palabiyik, D.S. Atik, D. Atik, M. Keskin, M. Keskin, A. Bozdeveci, A. Bozdeveci, & S.A. Karaoglu, S. Karaoglu. (0000). Comparison of Antibacterial and Antifungal Effects of Different Varieties of Honey and Propolis Samples. Acta alimentaria, 49, 515-523. doi: 10.1556/066.2020.49.4.18en_US
dc.identifier.issn0139-3006
dc.identifier.issn1588-2535
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1556/066.2020.49.4.18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/941
dc.descriptionBOZDEVECI, ARIF/0000-0002-0729-9143en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000590171200018en_US
dc.description.abstractHoney is the most important bee product. There are many secondary metabolites, carbohydrates, enzymes, and vitamins in honey, thus, honey has antimicrobial activity. in this study, in vitro antimicrobial activity of forty-two honey and eight propolis ethanolic extracts (PEE) were investigated against 16 microorganisms. Total phenolic content ranged between 20.00-124.10 mg GAE/100 g and 103-232 mg GAE/g for honey and raw propolis samples, respectively. Pine and oak honeydew honeys had higher antimicrobial activity than four different grades of Manuka Honeys up to 18 mm minimtun inhibition zone diameters. the ethanolic propolis extracts showed much higher antimicrobial activity than the honey samples. Fungi species were inhibited by the propolis samples. Helicobacter pylori( (H. pylorii) was the most sensitive, whereas Streptococcus agalactiae was the most resistant bacteria among the studied microorganisms. Brazilian and Zonguldak propolis had the closest antimicrobial activity to ampicillin, streptomycin, and fluconazole. It can be concluded that both honey and propolis could be used in preservative and complementary medicine.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAKTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [1147370]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by TUBITAK [grant number 1147370].en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAkademiai Kiado Zrten_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPine honeyen_US
dc.subjectOak honeyen_US
dc.subjectManukaen_US
dc.subjectBrazilian propolisen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic antibioticen_US
dc.titleComparison of antibacterial and antifungal effects of different varieties of honey and propolis samplesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Fen - Edebiyat Fakültesi, Biyoloji Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBozdeveci, Arif
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaraoğlu, Şengül Alpay
dc.identifier.doi10.1556/066.2020.49.4.18
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage515en_US
dc.identifier.endpage523en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalActa Alimentariaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster