Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Jin
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Emine
dc.contributor.authorAli, Kishwar
dc.contributor.authorMagazzino, Cosimo
dc.contributor.authorBarut, Abdulkadir
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-16T13:26:12Z
dc.date.available2025-06-16T13:26:12Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationZhao, J., Kaya, E., Ali, K., Magazzino, C., & Barut, A. (2024). The Asymmetric Effect of Foreign Ownership and Concentration on Financial Dollarization: The Case of the Turkish Economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02326-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1868-7865
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02326-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/10430
dc.description.abstractThe Turkish economy is fragile and exhibits high exchange rate volatility, and financial dollarization is chronic in this country. Thus, this study explores the asymmetric effect of foreign ownership and concentration on financial dollarization in Turkey. The study covers 2004: Q1–2020: Q2 quarterly period and determines the asymmetric relationship between foreign ownership and concentration on financial dollarization. The nonlinear autoregressive distributed lags (NARDL) model is used as a main model and the autoregressive distributed lags (ARDL) model, the Bayesian vector autoregression (BVAR) model, and the standard vector autoregression (VAR) model are employed for robustness checks. The NARDL model shows that concentration, exchange rate, foreign ownership, inflation, and GDP growth rates are effective factors in influencing deposit dollarization. The study confirms that positive (negative) shocks in concentration have a significant and positive (negative) effect on deposit dollarization in the short run. Also, the standard VAR model performs better than the BVAR model and the ARDL model and standard VAR model give approximately similar results to the NARDL model. These findings imply that speculative trading can be considered the cause of deposit dollarization and credit dollarization for Turkey, and domestic citizens do not dollarize the deposits to protect their wealth. Credit dollarization increases even if both positive and negative shocks happen to foreign ownership and concentration since credit dollarization may be seen as a hedging mechanism for the banking system in a high-inflation environment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectConcentrationen_US
dc.subjectCredit dollarizationen_US
dc.subjectDeposit dollarizationen_US
dc.subjectForeign ownershipen_US
dc.subjectInflationen_US
dc.titleThe asymmetric effect of foreign ownership and concentration on financial dollarization: the case of the Turkish economyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Fındıklı Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksekokulu, Finans ve Bankacılık Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBarut, Abdulkadir
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13132-024-02326-9en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Knowledge Economyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster