Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAltan Şallı, Gülay
dc.contributor.authorÖksüz, Mehmet Feryüz
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.authorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.authorNaralan, Muhammed Enes
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-04T06:40:01Z
dc.date.available2025-08-04T06:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationAltan Şallı, G., Öksüz, M. F., Köse, T. E., Günaçar, D. N., & Naralan, M. E. (2025). USG and CBCT indications in pediatric to adult dental patients: a university hospital study. BMC Oral Health, 25(1), 1010. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06407-2en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06407-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/10772
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the indications for requesting ultrasonography (USG) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients presenting to the Faculty of Dentistry. Methods: A total of 54 USG requests were retrospectively reviewed for age, sex, region examined, type of probe used, and whether Doppler USG was applied. Additionally, 5044 CBCT requests were analyzed according to age, sex, region of interest (ROI), field of view (FOV) size, and re-exposure rates, in line with DIMITRA and SEDENTEXCT guidelines. Indications not covered by DIMITRA were categorized as “other.” Pearson’s chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparisons of categorical variables, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: In the USG group, there were 28 male and 26 female patients. The mean age was 49.32 ± 15.29 years for males and 37.65 ± 14.47 years for females. The most common USG indications were soft tissue calcifications, lymph node evaluations, and soft tissue swellings. In the CBCT group, 507 patients (10.05%) were aged ≤ 18 years, and 4537 (89.95%) were older than 18 years. The overall mean age was 45.13 ± 16.83 years (range: 8–91). Of all patients, 2385 (47.28%) were male and 2659 (52.72%) were female. The most common CBCT indication was categorized as “other” (78.2%), followed by bone pathology (11.7%) and impacted teeth (7.6%). Implant planning was the leading reason within the “other” category (n = 3373, 85.5%). Conclusion: CBCT was more frequently utilized than USG across all age groups. To reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, adherence to optimized CBCT guidelines is essential. Moreover, broader implementation of USG should be encouraged in suitable cases.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectDental radiologyen_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.subjectIndicationen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.titleUSG and CBCT indications in pediatric to adult dental patients: a university hospital studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖksüz, Mehmet Feryüz
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.institutionauthorNaralan, Muhammed Enes
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1010en_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster