Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArslan, Emel
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, İpek
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-19T06:15:56Z
dc.date.available2025-08-19T06:15:56Z
dc.date.issued2025en_US
dc.identifier.citationArslan, E., & Caglar, I. (2025). Enhancing PEEK bond strength: the impact of chemical and mechanical surface modifications on surface characteristics and phase transformation. BMC oral health, 25(1), 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05933-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05933-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/10937
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study investigated the effects of different surface modifications on surface roughness, phase transformation, and bond strength of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to composite resin. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 specimens measuring 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were fabricated from PEEK blocks (BioHPP; Bredent GmbH & Co KG, Germany). Seven groups were randomly formed from the specimens: C) untreated control group, (SE) sulfuric acid application (Merck KGa, Darmstadt, Germany), (PE) piranha solution application (Albar Chemistry, Kocaeli, Turkey), (S) sandblasting with Al2O3 particle (Zhermack, Rovigo, Italy), (T) tribochemical silica coating (3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany), (L) Er-YAG laser treatment (LightWalker AT, Fotona, Slovenia), and (P) plasma treatment (Kinpen, Neoplas, Germany) (n = 20). Surface topography was examined using a profilometer device (Taylor Hobson, Leicester, England). Surface images of the specimens were captured using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (JSM- 6610, Jeol, USA). Phase change analysis was conducted on each group using an X-Ray Diffractometer device (Rigaku SmartLab Diffraktometer, Tokyo, Japan). After thermal aging, shear bond strength was tested using a Universal Test Machine (Model 3340, Instron Corp., Wycombe, UK). Data were analyzed with One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test; comparisons were made with Tukey's multiple comparison test, with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Group S (3.09 ± 0.40 μm) exhibited significantly higher surface roughness values compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Group SE (13.28 ± 1.69 MPa) exhibited significantly higher shear bond strength values than the other groups (p < 0.05). No statistically significant correlation was found between surface roughness and bond strength data (p > 0.05). According to XRD results, Group S and Group L differ from the other groups in having a slightly higher intensity and broader peaks. Conclusions: All surface modification methods enhanced the bond strength between PEEK to composite resin. However, Group L and Group S revealed different XRD patterns from the control group. Tribochemical silica coating can be a reliable alternative method for acid applications due to its stable phase structure and high bond strength.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBond strengthen_US
dc.subjectPhase transformationen_US
dc.subjectPolyetheretherketoneen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen_US
dc.subjectX-Ray Diffractometeren_US
dc.titleEnhancing PEEK bond strength: the impact of chemical and mechanical surface modifications on surface characteristics and phase transformationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇağlar, İpek
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-025-05933-3en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage511en_US
dc.relation.journalBMC Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster