Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Hülya
dc.contributor.authorÇekiç, Bahanur
dc.contributor.authorBeşir, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorGeze, Sükran
dc.contributor.authorHocaoğlu, Çiçek
dc.contributor.authorAkdoğan, Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:13:21Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:13:21Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationUlusoy, H., Cekic, B., Besir, A., Geze, S., Hocaoglu, C., Akdogan, A., (2014). Sevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy: Comparison of seizure duration and haemodynamic responses. Journal of International Medical Research, 42(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060513509036
dc.identifier.issn0300-0605
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0300060513509036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/4011
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24398757en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the anaesthetic and convulsive effects of sevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil combination in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Methods: In this prospective, randomized double-blind study, patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant depression were included for ECT. Prior to treatment, 1 ?g/kg remifentanil was intravenously administered to all patients, followed by anaesthetic induction with either 0.5 mg/kg propofol or 8% sevoflurane. Following muscular paralysis with succinylcholine and hypnosis, bitemporal ECT was applied. Vital signs, depth of sedation, recovery parameters, motor and electroencephalography (EEG) convulsion activity and postictal suppression index scores were recorded. Results: A total of 120 sessions of ECT were administered to 12 patients. Heart rate was higher in the sevoflurane group than the propofol group. Compared with the sevoflurane group, bispectral index level was lower in the propofol group during the induction period and higher during the recovery period. Anaesthetic induction and recovery times were lower, and average motor and EEG convulsion activity was longer, in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group. Conclusion: Propofol/remifentanil is more successful compared with sevoflurane/remifentanil in anaesthesia management during ECT since it provides quick induction and recovery, longer seizure activity and stable haemodynamics. © The Author(s) 2014.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectElectroconvulsive therapyen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectSeizureen_US
dc.subjectSevofluraneen_US
dc.titleSevoflurane/remifentanil versus propofol/remifentanil for electroconvulsive therapy: comparison of seizure duration and haemodynamic responsesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorHocaoğlu, Çiçek
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0300060513509036
dc.identifier.volume42en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage111en_US
dc.identifier.endpage119en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of International Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster