Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaradaş, Muhammet
dc.contributor.authorÇelikoğlu, Mevlüt
dc.contributor.authorAkdağ, Mustafa Sadık
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:15:52Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:15:52Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationKaradas, M., Celikoglu, M., & Akdag, M. S. (2014). Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey. European journal of dentistry, 8(3), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/4059
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. Materials and Methods: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distribution of the hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia using panoramic radiographs. All permanent teeth were investigated except thirds molars and the data obtained were recorded as unilateral (left or right) or bilateral according to gender. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for difference comparisons (P < 0.05). Results: Permanent tooth anomalies were found in at least 132 (4.84%) of 2722 patients with no statistically difference between the genders, consists of 4.63% females and 5.12% males. Distribution of hyperdontia was statistically significant difference between genders, whereas distribution of hypodontia and oligodontia was no significant difference between genders. Hypodontia was the most frequently observed anomaly (3.67%), followed by hyperdontia (0.96%), and oligodontia (0.21%). Oligodontia and hypodontia were more frequent in females (3.98% and 0.26%, respectively), whereas hyperdontia was more frequently observed in males (1.68%). Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth (2.27%), while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. Conclusion: The prevalence of teeth number anomalies was 4.84% of dental patients. Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth, while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. © 2014 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherDental Investigations Societyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectHyperdontiaen_US
dc.subjectHypodontiaen_US
dc.subjectOligodontiaen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaradaş, Muhammet
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/1305-7456.137641
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage337en_US
dc.identifier.endpage341en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster