Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEmir, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKunt, Ayşe Gül
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBozok, Şahin
dc.contributor.authorKarakişi, Sedat Ozan
dc.contributor.authorUǧuz, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorHidiroǧlu, Mete
dc.contributor.authorÇetin, Levent
dc.contributor.authorŞener, Erol
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:16:28Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationEmir, M., Kunt, A. G., Çiçek, M., Bozok, Ş., Karakişi, S. O., Uğuz, E., Hidiroğlu, M., Çetin, L., & Şener, E. (2012). Sequential radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: five-year follow-up and evaluation with multi-detector row computed tomography. Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions, 13(5), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.003en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-8389
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/4202
dc.descriptionPubMed: 22889883en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to compare early postoperative results, programmed multi-detector row computed tomography coronary angiographic patency and midterm results of revascularization by sequential radial artery grafting with those of single radial artery grafting during a five-year period. Patients were grouped as those with sequential radial artery grafts (Group A, n = 27) and single radial artery grafts (Group B, n = 26). Multi-detector row computed tomography coronary angiography was scheduled at 1 and 5. years postoperatively. Each distal anastomosis was accepted as nonfunctional if a radial artery graft was occluded proximally or there was a critical stenosis. One sequential radial artery graft and two single radial artery grafts failed in the 1-year period (p>. 0.05). In the 5-year period, three radial artery grafts failed in each group (p>. 0.05). In Group A, there was no mortality in the five-year period, but in Group B, one patient died four years after the operation due to cardiac problems (p>. 0.05). In addition to one death in Group B, there were three percutaneous interventions and two myocardial infarctions among the 26 patients during the five-year follow-up. In group A, among 27 patients, there were 4 percutaneous interventions and one myocardial infarction (p>. 0.05). Although the sample size is relatively small to be conclusive, these data suggest that sequential radial artery grafting may be considered as a method of choice for maximizing arterial graft survival and patency. Noninvasive control of sequential and single radial artery grafts with multi-detector row computed tomography is feasible with no discomfort for the patient and excellent visualization of grafts. © 2012.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnastomosisen_US
dc.subjectMulti-detector row computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectRadial arteryen_US
dc.subjectSequential graftingen_US
dc.titleSequential radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting: Five-year follow-up and evaluation with multi-detector row computed tomographyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorEmir, Mustafa
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBozok, Şahin
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKarakişi, Sedat Ozan
dc.contributor.institutionauthorŞener, Erol
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.carrev.2012.07.003
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage272en_US
dc.identifier.endpage276en_US
dc.relation.journalCardiovascular Revascularization Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster