Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUzun, Hakkı
dc.contributor.authorZorba, Orhan Ünal
dc.contributor.authorTomak, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorBostan, Habip
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:16:49Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationUzun, H., Zorba, O. Ü., Tomak, Y., Bostan, H., & Kalkan, M. (2012). Internal urethrotomy under local urethral anaesthesia is feasible with sedation and analgesia. Nephro-urology monthly, 4(4), 636–639. https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.4524en_US
dc.identifier.issn2251-7006
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.4524
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/4278
dc.description.abstractBackground: Urethral stricture is a common condition, and direct vision internal urethrotomy is prefered as the first treatment option by many urologists, for strictures shorter than 2 cm. This procedure is generally performed under general or spinal anaesthesia. Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of adding local urethral anaesthesia to intravenous sedation and analgesia (sedoanalgesia) methods in patients undergoing internal urethrotomy. Patients and Methods: A total of 21 and 15 patients with anterior urethral strictures underwent internal urethrotomy under local urethral anaesthesia, with or without sedoanalgesia, respectively. Patient discomfort and pain levels were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analyses were calculated with a Mann-Whitney U test to compare difference in VAS scores between the subjects in both groups. Results: Two of the 15 (13%) patients operated under local urethral anaesthesia without sedoanalgesia were converted to general anaesthesia due to patient intolerability. Mean pain VAS scores for patients operated under 2% lidocain urethral gel anaesthesia with or without sedoanalgesia were 2.86 cm and 4.5 cm, respectively (P = 0.001). In addition, a VAS score over 3 cm was found in 3 of the 21 (14%) patients with, and 13 of the 15 (86%) patients without sedoanalgesia (P = 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of intravenous sedoanalgesia improved the VAS scores of pain and discomfort, compared to patients operated under only local urethral anaesthesia. This may offer patients safer anaesthesia and shorter operative times with equilavent results in selected patients. © 2012 Nephrology and Urology Research Center and Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKowsar Medical Publishing Companyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectInternal urethrotomyen_US
dc.subjectUrethral strictureen_US
dc.titleInternal urethrotomy under local urethral anaesthesia is feasible with sedation and analgesiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUzun, Hakkı
dc.contributor.institutionauthorZorba, Orhan Ünal
dc.contributor.institutionauthorTomak, Yakup
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBostan, Habip
dc.identifier.doi10.5812/numonthly.4524
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage636en_US
dc.identifier.endpage639en_US
dc.relation.journalNephro-Urology Monthlyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster