Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorRakıcı, Sema Yılmaz
dc.contributor.authorBedir, Recep
dc.contributor.authorHatipoğlu, Celile
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:24:56Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:24:56Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationYılmaz Rakıcı, S., Bedir, R., & Hatipoğlu, C. (2019). Are there predictors that can determine neoadjuvant treatment responses in rectal cancer?. The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 30(3), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.18179en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-4948
dc.identifier.issn2148-5607
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TWprNE1UQTBOQT09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/4931
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2018.18179en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: This study aimed to determine a predictive bioindicator that would detect the treatment response of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Materials and Methods: The data collected from 37 patients receiving nCRT were retrospectively evaluated. The p53 score and gene instability in MLH1 and MSH2, which are among the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, were evaluated using immunohistochemical methods. The neutrophils-leukocytes ratio (NLR), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 values were obtained as hematological parameters from computer records. The pathologic analysis of the therapy response after nCRT was classified according to the modified grading system by Ryan et al. Results: The changes in the NLR, CEA, and CA19-9 values before and after treatment were statistically significant (p?0.001 and p=0.005). A near significant effect of the decrease of the CEA value in the 5th week after treatment was detected on the pathological response score (p=0.075). The p53 mutation score in those patients with any residue was higher than the total response. Overall, 89.2% of the patients exhibited MMR positivity (stability), and 10.8% of the cases with MRM negativity (instability) had a macroscopic residue. Cases with pathological total response were MRM positive. Conclusion: Consequently, in most of the patients treated with nCRT, the treatment caused tumor and nodal remission. In the prediction of this therapy response, hematological and genetic parameters, such as NLR, P53, MLH1, and MSH2, play a predictive role.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGastroenterolojien_US
dc.subjectRectal neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant treatmenten_US
dc.subjectDNA mismatch repairen_US
dc.subjectMicrosatellite instabilityen_US
dc.titleAre there predictors that can determine neoadjuvant treatment responses in rectal cancer?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorRakıcı, Sema Yılmaz
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBedir, Recep
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/tjg.2018.18179en_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage220en_US
dc.identifier.endpage227en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster