Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKoşar, Tuğba
dc.contributor.authorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T08:22:45Z
dc.date.available2022-12-13T08:22:45Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationKosar, T., Gunacar, D.N. & Kose, T.E. (2021). Three-dimensional Volumetric/linear Analysis and Axial Classification of Root Resorptions Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 24(2), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.890067.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2146-2852
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.890067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/7269
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the volumetric-linear analysis and to present a new axial classification of root resorptions using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: A total of 43 teeth with root resorption (external cervical resorption (ECR) (n=27), external replacement resorption (ERR) (n=4) and internal root resorption (IRR) (n=12)) from 34 patients were included in this study. On CBCT images of teeth, the volume of total tooth and resorption for the volumetric analysis, the widest lengths of resorptions and the amount of thinnest dentin thickness around them for the linear analysis were measured, and volumetric/linear measurements were compared according to age and gender. In addition, the eight regional axial classification was performed, and these regions were compared. Data were evaluated using Shapiro-Wilk, Pearson’s r., Kruskal-Wallis and Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post-hoc tests. Significance was set at p=0.05 for statistical analysis. Results: No significant difference was found between the volumetric and linear measurements of ECRs, ERRs, and IRRs. No difference between genders in volumetric and linear measurements of ECRs and IRRs, except total tooth volume, was higher in males than in females in ECRs (p<0.05). With increasing age in ECRs, the buccal dentin thickness increased, and bucco-lingual length and total tooth volume decreased (p<0.05). In axial classification, ECRs were mostly found in lingual, while IRRs and ERRs did not show regional differences. Conclusions: Although root resorptions had different localizations and classifications, they did not differ in terms of volumetric and linear measurements due to having similar nature. Using CBCT imaging, the volumetric/linear analysis and axial classification of resorptions, and demographic differences according to these parameters can help clinicians in understanding the nature of resorption and in determining appropriate management.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCumhuriyet University Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectClassificationen_US
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographyen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectRoot resorptionen_US
dc.titleThree-dimensional volumetric/linear analysis and axial classification of root resorptions using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.identifier.doi10.7126/cumudj.890067en_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage170en_US
dc.identifier.endpage181en_US
dc.relation.journalCumhuriyet Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster