Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorArumugam, Chelliah
dc.contributor.authorShaik, Saboor
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Abin
dc.contributor.authorKontoleon, Karolos J.
dc.contributor.authorCüce, Erdem
dc.contributor.authorShaik, Aabid Hussain
dc.contributor.authorChakraborty, Samarshi
dc.contributor.authorAlwetaishi, Mamdooh
dc.contributor.authorCüce, Pınar Mert
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Manish
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T08:12:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T08:12:16Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationArumugam, C., Shaik, S., Roy, A., Kontoleon, K.J., Cüce, E., Shaik, A.H., Chakraborty, S., Alwetaishi, M., Cüce, P.M. & Gupta, m. (2024). Analysis of the benefits of adopting roof sandwich panels integrated with PCM versus PUR to mitigate energy costs and carbon dioxide emissions. Journal of Energy Storage, 77, 109947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109947en_US
dc.identifier.issn2352-152X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109947
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/8717
dc.description.abstractThe construction industry's thirst for power has skyrocketed on a global scale. A significant amount of this power is used for buildings' heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning needs (HVAC systems), which in turn ensure occupants' comfort. A sustainable future requires more zero-energy or green buildings to meet the massive global energy demand. This study explores the possibility of reducing air conditioning expenses while taking into account various roof systems referring to sheet panels integrated with thermal insulation or a phase change material. Within the context of the current investigation, four sheet panels made of acrylic, aluminium, galvanized iron, and polycarbonate were examined. In addition, aforementioned sheet panels were filled with either polyurethane (PUR) foam insulation or a form-stable phase change material of FS29, an organic and inorganic mixture. In order to ascertain the thermo-physical properties of FS29 PCM (in both its solid and liquid phases), as well as its latent heat, experiments were carried out. According to the findings, the roof with the acrylic PCM integrated roof (ACPIR) succeeds in the best annual air conditioning or energy cost savings (7.90 and 8.18 $/m2/year), the highest carbon emission mitigations (144.15 and 156.44 kg-CO2/year) and the shortest payback period (9 and 8.7 years), for India's composite and warm-humid climatic conditions.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide mitigationen_US
dc.subjectEnergy cost savingsen_US
dc.subjectPhase change materialen_US
dc.subjectPolyurethane foamen_US
dc.subjectRoof panel systemsen_US
dc.subjectThermo-economic analysisen_US
dc.titleAnalysis of the benefits of adopting roof sandwich panels integrated with PCM versus PUR to mitigate energy costs and carbon dioxide emissionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorCüce, Erdem
dc.contributor.institutionauthorCüce, Pınar Mert
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.est.2023.109947en_US
dc.identifier.volume77en_US
dc.identifier.startpage109947en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Energy Storageen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster