Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, İpek
dc.contributor.authorAteş, Sabit Melih
dc.contributor.authorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:41:53Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:41:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCaglar, I., Ates, S. M., & Yesil Duymus, Z. (2018). The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 10(2), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/1847
dc.descriptionAtes, Sabit Melih/0000-0001-7137-2096; caglar, ipek/0000-0002-2286-4657en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000431063600008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 29713434en_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare three polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 100 disk shaped specimens (10 mm diameter, 3 mm thickness) were fabricated from monolithic zirconia blocks. 20 specimens were left as a control group and remaining specimens were grinded by diamond bur to simulate the occlusal adjustments. Grinded specimens were randomly divided into 4 groups: group G (no polishing), group M (Meisinger, zirconia polishing kit), group E (EVE Diacera, zirconia polishing kit), and group P (EVE Diapol, porcelain polishing kit). Surface roughness was measured with profilometer and surface topography was observed with SEM. XRD analysis was performed to investigate the phase transformation. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests at a significance level of P=.05. RESULTS. All polishing groups showed a smoother surface than group G. Among 3 polishing systems, group M and group E exhibited a smoother surface than the group P. However, no significant differences were observed between group M and group E (P >.05). Grinding and polishing did not cause phase transformations in zirconia specimens. CONCLUSION. Zirconia polishing systems created a smoother surface on zirconia than the porcelain polishing system. Phase transformation did not occur during the polishing procedure.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGrindingen_US
dc.subjectMonolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.subjectPhase transformationen_US
dc.subjectPolishingen_US
dc.subjectSurface roughnessen_US
dc.titleThe effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇağlar, İpek
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAteş, Sabit Melih
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.132
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage132en_US
dc.identifier.endpage137en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster