Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMcIlroy, David
dc.contributor.authorPalmer-Conn, Sue
dc.contributor.authorLawler, Bridget
dc.contributor.authorPoole, Karen
dc.contributor.authorUrsavas, Ömer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:48:44Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationMcIlroy, D., Palmer-Conn, S., Lawler, B., Poole, K. & Ursavas, O.F. (2017) Secondary Level Achievement Non-Intellective Factors Implicated in the Process and Product of Performance. Journal of Individual Differences, 38 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000227en_US
dc.identifier.issn1614-0001
dc.identifier.issn2151-2299
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000227
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/2151
dc.descriptionURSAVAS, Omer Faruk/0000-0002-5759-7894; Mcilroy, David/0000-0001-6502-2938en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000404998200005en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was developed in the context of Personality and Social Cognitive Theory with constructs that encapsulate non-intellective processes of academic achievement. the goal was to explore the role of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality in academic performance and to use this model as a reference point to test the incremental validity of two measures of Self-efficacy (Academic and Emotional) and an indicator of Absenteeism. Participants (N = 120) were comprised of 17-year-old male (n = 47) and female (n = 73) opportunistically sampled secondary level college students. A cross-sectional design was used to examine the relationship between the independent variables (FFM, Academic Self-efficacy, Emotional Self-efficacy, and Absenteeism) and the outcome variable, Grade Points Average (GPA). Correlation analysis found that four FFM factors and the two Self-efficacy measures were associated with GPA. in a hierarchical regression analysis, the FFM explained 22% variance on performance and the two Self-efficacy measures added 9% incremental variance followed by 3% for Absenteeism. Overall, the non-intellective constructs explain a substantial 34% variance on achievement and provide focal points for theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical evaluation. Moreover, they are suggestive of the pathways and processes that support learning, augment ability, and enhance achievement.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherHogrefe & Huber Publishersen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPersonalityen_US
dc.subjectSelf-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectAttendanceen_US
dc.subjectSecondary educationen_US
dc.subjectAcademic achievementen_US
dc.titleSecondary level achievement non-intellective factors implicated in the process and product of performanceen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorUrsavas, Ömer Faruk
dc.identifier.doi10.1027/1614-0001/a000227
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage102en_US
dc.identifier.endpage112en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Individual Differencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster