Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGündoğdu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.contributor.authorAlkurt, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:03:00Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationGundogdu, M., Duymus, Z.Y., Alkurt, M. (2014). Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,112(4), 964-971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.017en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/3052
dc.descriptionGundogdu, Mustafa/0000-0003-2527-0392en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000342543500043en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24726594en_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Adhesive failure between acrylic resin and resilient liner material is commonly encountered in clinical practice. Purpose. the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of 2 different resilient lining materials to an acrylic resin denture base. Material and methods. Ninety-six dumbbell-shaped specimens were fabricated from heat-polymerized acrylic resin, and 3 mm of the material was cut from the thin midsection. the specimens were divided into 6 groups according to their surface treatments: no surface treatment (control group), 36% phosphoric acid etching (acid group), erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser (laser group), airborne-particle abrasion with 50-mu m Al2O3 particles (abrasion group), an acid+laser group, and an abrasion+laser group. the specimens in each group were divided into 2 subgroups according to the resilient lining material used: heat-polymerized silicone based resilient liner (Molloplast B) and autopolymerized silicone-based resilient liner (Ufi Gel P). After all of the specimens had been polymerized, they were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 1 week. A tensile bond strength test was then performed. Data were analyzed with a 2-way ANOVA, and the Sidak multiple comparison test was used to identify significant differences (alpha=.05). the effects of the surface treatments and resilient lining materials on the surface of the denture base resin were examined with scanning electron microscopy. Results. the tensile bond strength was significantly different between Molloplast B and Ufi Gel P (P<.001). the specimens of the acid group had the highest tensile bond strength, whereas those of the abrasion group had the lowest tensile bond strength. the scanning electron microscopy observations showed that the application of surface treatments modified the surface of the denture base resin. Conclusions. Molloplast B exhibited significantly higher bond strength than Ufi Gel P. Altering the surface of the acrylic resin denture base with 36% phosphoric acid etching increased bond strength.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Projects (Ataturk University)Ataturk University [2005/102]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by the 2005/102 numbered project of Scientific Research Projects (Ataturk University).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectPhysical-propertiesen_US
dc.titleEffect of surface treatments on the bond strength of soft denture lining materials to an acrylic resin denture baseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDuymuş, Zeynep Yeşil
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.017
dc.identifier.volume112en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage964en_US
dc.identifier.endpage971en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster