Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSongür, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorToktaş, Muhsin
dc.contributor.authorAlkoç, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Tolgahan
dc.contributor.authorUzun, İbrahim
dc.contributor.authorBaş, Orhan
dc.contributor.authorÖzen, Oğuz Aslan
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T20:05:45Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T20:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationSongür, A., Toktaş, M., Alkoç, O., Acar, T., Uzun, İ., Baş, O. & Özen, O.A. (2010). Abdominal aorta and its branches: Morphometry - Variations in autopsy cases. European Journal of General Medicine, 7(3), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82876en_US
dc.identifier.issn1304-3889
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/82876
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/3481
dc.description.abstractAim: Knowing the morphology of abdominal aorta (AA) and its branches are important as regards to diagnosis and surgical treatment. The aims of this study were to a) make morphometric measurements of AA and its branches, b) to investigate sites of the origins of the branches and their relationships and variations, and c) to compare the results with literature.Method: Ninety-five AA which had been removed in autopsies were measured with caliper morphometrically to determine diameters of branches and distances between branches. Possible variation of the vessels were investigated and photographed.Result: It was found that diameters of celiac trunk (CT), superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) were 6.43±1.59 mm, 7.38±1.67 mm and 3.61±0.72 mm respectively. The distances between CT and aortic bifurcation (AB), CT and SMA, SMA and IMA, IMA and AB were 107.21±11.46 mm, 14.34±2.67 mm, 57.76±8.04 mm, 35.20±7.41 mm respectively. Numerous variations were observed during the study. These variations involved inferior phrenic artery (single trunk arising from CT, 4.2%), renal artery-RA (duplicated right RA 9.5%, duplicated left RA 4.2%, bilaterally duplicated 3.1%, %16.8 total multiple RA), gonadal arteries-GA (single GA, 1%), lumbar arteries-LA (3 pairs of LA 11.5%, 3rd or 4th LA arising as single trunk 3.1%) and median sacral artery (agenesis 2.1%). Conclusion: Knowledge of morphology of AA and its branches is important in regards to the diagnosis, surgical treatment and endovascular interventions of these vessels. We think our study will contribute to the medical education and clinical medicine in our country.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherTıp Araştırmaları Derneğien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal aortaen_US
dc.subjectBranchesen_US
dc.subjectMorphometryen_US
dc.subjectVariationen_US
dc.titleAbdominal aorta and its branches: Morphometry - Variations in autopsy casesen_US
dc.title.alternativeAorta abdominalis ve dallari: Otopsi olgularında morfometri ve varyasyonlarıen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBaş, Orhan
dc.identifier.doi10.29333/ejgm/82876
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage321en_US
dc.identifier.endpage325en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of General Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster