Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.authorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.authorAteş, Sabit Melih
dc.contributor.authorÇağlar, İpek
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T07:42:05Z
dc.date.available2022-09-27T07:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.identifier.citationKöse, T. E., Günaçar, D. N., Ateş, S. M., & Çağlar, İ. (2021). Artifact expression of polyetheretherketone in cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 126(6), 793.e1–793.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.028en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/6557
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Dental prosthetic materials can cause artifacts in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, adversely affecting diagnostic quality, although the problem may be less with polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Studies evaluating the artifacts caused by frequently used prosthetic materials are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the artifacts in CBCT images caused by PEEK, zirconia, cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy, and titanium (Ti). Material and methods. A polymethylmethacrylate phantom (empty set4.0x4.0 cm) with a central cylindrical aperture (empty set0.5x0.5 cm) was produced. Co-Cr, Ti, zirconia, and PEEK cylinders (0.5x0.5 cm) were manufactured, and CBCT images of the empty phantom (control group) with the test cylinders inside were made 3 times. In all images, the axial sections passing through the middle of the materials were evaluated. Eight regions of interest (ROI) area were determined around the materials (0.5x0.5 cm). The presence of artifacts was evaluated by making gray value standard deviation (SD) calculations in these ROI areas. The average SD values of 8 ROI fields from the 3 CBCT scans were made, and the materials were compared with each other in terms of the presence of artifacts by using 1-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). Results. The difference between the SD values of the control and the PEEK cylinder was not statistically significant (P>.05). The SD values of both the control and PEEK groups were significantly lower than those of the zirconia, Co-Cr, and Ti groups (P<.05). Conclusions. Zirconia, Ti, and Co-Cr caused artifacts in CBCT images, but the artifacts with PEEK were similar to those in the control group, suggesting it was the optimal choice in terms of achieving diagnostic quality.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSurface pretreatmentsen_US
dc.subjectImplant materialsen_US
dc.subjectBond strenghten_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.subjectReductionen_US
dc.subjectCBCTen_US
dc.titleArtifact expression of polyetheretherketone in cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKöse, Taha Emre
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGünaçar, Dilara Nil
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAteş, Sabit Melih
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇağlar, İpek
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.028en_US
dc.identifier.volume126en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage793.e1en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster