Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHatipoğlu, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorMaraş, Edanur
dc.contributor.authorHatipoğlu, Fatma Pertek
dc.contributor.authorSaygın, Ayşegül Göze
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T06:44:47Z
dc.date.available2022-12-02T06:44:47Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationvHatipoglu, O., Maras, E., Hatipoglu, F. P., & Saygin, A. G. (2022). Salivary flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity in the individuals with obesity and overweight; A meta-analysis. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 25(7), 1126–1142. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_1760_21en_US
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_1760_21
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/7206
dc.description.abstractBackground: Weight in individuals can affect the saliva structure, which has an essential role in caries prevention. Aim: This meta-analysis aimed to compare individuals with obesity (OB)/overweight (OW) and normal weight (NW) in terms of salivary flow rate (SFR), salivary pH (SpH), salivary buffer capacity (SBC). Materials and Methods: After electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Open Grey databases) were screened, studies were selected depending on inclusion criteria. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in individual studies. Mean differences (MD) were used to measure the effect estimates in the comparisons of OB vs NW, OW vs NW, and OB+OW vs NW. Additional analyzes such as subgroup, moderator, sensitivity, and grade were also performed. Results: 24 studies and 2072 participants (SFR: 748 OB, 896 NW, SpH: 137 OB, 166 NW, SBC: 62 OB, 63 NW) were included in the quantitative synthesis. Significantly lower SFR was found in the group with OB compared to NW when saliva was stimulated (MD = -0.21, 95% CI [-0.30, -0.12], P < 0.001), but no significance was obtained when saliva was unstimulated (MD = -0.02, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.06], P = 0.55). No significant difference was found in the group with OB compared to NW in SpH (MD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.26,0.12], P = 0.48) and SBC (MD = -1.10, 95% CI [-2.29,0.09], P = 0.07). Conclusions: SFR significantly decreases in individuals with OB, notably when saliva is stimulated. Besides, the decrease in SFR is much more prominent in adolescence and adulthood than in childhood. Furthermore, the increase in the severity of OB causes a much greater decrease in SFR. However, regarding SpH and SBC, no significant association exists.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectSalivaen_US
dc.titleSalivary flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity in the individuals with obesity and overweight; A meta-analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorMaraş, Edanur
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/njcp.njcp_1760_21en_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1126en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1142en_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster