Comparative evaluation of the performance of different AI chatbots in answering pediatric dentistry questions in the Turkish dental specialization exam

dc.contributor.authorSakın Ulubay, Sena
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-08T08:33:18Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: Artificial intelligence-powered chatbots, whose use is becoming increasingly widespread, are frequently used in medicine and dentistry for tasks such as generating academic texts, student education, clinical diagnosis, and patient information. Given their inherent limitations, the accuracy of chatbot responses in the healthcare field is a crucial issue. Evaluating the performance of artificial intelligence in national examinations can provide objective data regarding its use as an educational support tool. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the performance of various artificial intelligence chatbots on questions from the pediatric dentistry section of the DUS (Dental Specialization Exam). Methods: A total of 127 questions asked in the DUS in the field of pediatric dentistry between 2012 and 2021 were included in the study. The questions were divided into nine subject-area categories, two exam years, and two question types: clinical case-based and theoretical knowledge-based. The ChatGPT-5, ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Claude Opus 4, and Claude Sonnet 4 models were evaluated in the study. Descriptive data are presented as numbers and percentages. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochran's Q test (p < 0.05); pairwise comparisons were made using the McNemar test and Bonferroni correction. Results: Gemini 2.5 Pro answered 93.7% of the questions correctly; ChatGPT-5 and Claude Opus 4 answered 88.9%, ChatGPT 4 and Gemini 2.5 Flash answered 87.4%, and Claude Sonnet 4 answered 83.4%. Gemini 2.5 Pro's performance in correctly answering questions was significantly higher than that of Claude Sonnet 4 (p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the chatbots' correct-answer performance when comparing by subject, year, and question type (clinical case and theoretical knowledge) (p > 0.05). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that chatbots perform well at answering exam questions in pediatric dentistry and may serve aspromising supplementary educational tool.
dc.identifier.citationSakin Ulubay S. (2026). Comparative evaluation of the performance of different AI chatbots in answering pediatric dentistry questions in the Turkish dental specialization exam. BMC oral health, 26(1), 2030. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09371-7
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-026-09371-7
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid42482234
dc.identifier.startpage2030
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-09371-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/13749
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorSakın Ulubay, Sena
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectChatGPT
dc.subjectChatbots
dc.subjectClaude
dc.subjectDental specialization exam
dc.subjectExam
dc.subjectGemini
dc.subjectPediatric dentistry
dc.titleComparative evaluation of the performance of different AI chatbots in answering pediatric dentistry questions in the Turkish dental specialization exam
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ulubay-2026 (2).pdf
Boyut:
1001.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: