Stress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis

dc.contributor.authorJaghoub, Qassam
dc.contributor.authorYeşil, Çağla
dc.contributor.authorYeşil, Zeynep
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-06T06:54:07Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentRTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü
dc.description.abstractBackground: This finite element analysis compared stress distribution and displacement in the implant-crown complex and peri-implant bone between angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implants supporting posterior maxillary single crowns under standardized modeling conditions. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of a maxillary first molar single crown in Misch bone density category 3 was generated. Two base models representing a bendable one-piece implant and a two-piece angulated implant system (15°, 4.1 × 11.5 mm) were each evaluated with 2 crown materials (monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate) and a 0.05-mm cement layer. The bendable one-piece implant was analyzed in its final post-adjustment geometry. All component interfaces were defined as idealized bonded contacts, and a 100-N oblique load at 30° was applied to the occlusal surface in a linear static analysis. Results: Implant von Mises stresses were markedly higher in the bendable one-piece models (518-529 MPa) than in the two-piece angulated models (109-112 MPa), representing an approximately 4.7-times-higher stress level. Cement-layer stresses ranged from 22 to 29 MPa and were higher in the two-piece configurations. Crown displacement was approximately two times higher in the two-piece configurations (0.036-0.037 mm) than in the one-piece configurations (0.018 mm). Peri-implant bone principal stresses were also higher in the one-piece models, whereas differences between zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns were modest. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this finite element analysis, the two-piece angulated configuration was associated with lower implant and peri-implant bone stresses than the bendable one-piece configuration, although it showed higher cement-layer stress and crown displacement. These results represent comparative behavior within an idealized model.
dc.identifier.citationJaghoub, Q., Yeşil, Ç., & Yeşil, Z. (2026). Stress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis. BMC oral health, 26(1), 1485. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid42157205
dc.identifier.startpage1485
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/13742
dc.identifier.volume26
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorYeşil, Çağla
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Oral Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAbutment connection
dc.subjectBendable implant
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectOne-piece implant
dc.subjectPosterior maxilla
dc.subjectTwo-piece implant
dc.titleStress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
yeşil-2026 (2).pdf
Boyut:
1.18 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: