Stress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Jaghoub, Qassam | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yeşil, Çağla | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yeşil, Zeynep | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-11-06T06:54:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.department | RTEÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: This finite element analysis compared stress distribution and displacement in the implant-crown complex and peri-implant bone between angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implants supporting posterior maxillary single crowns under standardized modeling conditions. Methods: A three-dimensional finite element model of a maxillary first molar single crown in Misch bone density category 3 was generated. Two base models representing a bendable one-piece implant and a two-piece angulated implant system (15°, 4.1 × 11.5 mm) were each evaluated with 2 crown materials (monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate) and a 0.05-mm cement layer. The bendable one-piece implant was analyzed in its final post-adjustment geometry. All component interfaces were defined as idealized bonded contacts, and a 100-N oblique load at 30° was applied to the occlusal surface in a linear static analysis. Results: Implant von Mises stresses were markedly higher in the bendable one-piece models (518-529 MPa) than in the two-piece angulated models (109-112 MPa), representing an approximately 4.7-times-higher stress level. Cement-layer stresses ranged from 22 to 29 MPa and were higher in the two-piece configurations. Crown displacement was approximately two times higher in the two-piece configurations (0.036-0.037 mm) than in the one-piece configurations (0.018 mm). Peri-implant bone principal stresses were also higher in the one-piece models, whereas differences between zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns were modest. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this finite element analysis, the two-piece angulated configuration was associated with lower implant and peri-implant bone stresses than the bendable one-piece configuration, although it showed higher cement-layer stress and crown displacement. These results represent comparative behavior within an idealized model. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Jaghoub, Q., Yeşil, Ç., & Yeşil, Z. (2026). Stress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis. BMC oral health, 26(1), 1485. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6831 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 42157205 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1485 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08415-2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11436/13742 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 26 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.institutionauthor | Yeşil, Çağla | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | BioMed Central | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Oral Health | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Abutment connection | |
| dc.subject | Bendable implant | |
| dc.subject | Finite element analysis | |
| dc.subject | One-piece implant | |
| dc.subject | Posterior maxilla | |
| dc.subject | Two-piece implant | |
| dc.title | Stress distribution in angulated bendable one-piece and two-piece implant-supported single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a finite element analysis | |
| dc.type | Article |











