Explainable AI-based prediction of lithium-ion battery aging: A comparative study at low and moderate temperatures
| dc.contributor.author | Hadji, Fatah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hadji, Atmane | |
| dc.contributor.author | Belfennache D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yekhlef R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fatmi M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yaylacı, Murat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Abualreish, Mustafa Jaipallah Abdelmageed | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-06T07:17:19Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.department | RTEÜ, Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates temperature-driven degradation mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence, comparing performance at 4 °C and 24 °C. A dataset of 7000 electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements demonstrates pronounced thermal effects on aging behavior. At 24 °C, capacity retention remains above 0.90 over extended cycling, gradually declining to 0.80–0.85, whereas operation at 4 °C shows accelerated degradation, with capacity dropping below 0.85 during early cycles and reaching 0.70–0.75 prematurely. Charge transfer resistance (Rct) below 50 mΩ corresponds to more than 80% remaining useful life (RUL), while Rct values exceeding 100 mΩ indicate critical degradation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identifies capacity (±0.35), Rct (−0.40 to −0.05), and temperature (±0.20) as dominant predictive features. Among eight regression models evaluated, Random Forest achieves the best performance with R2 = 0.933, MAE = 13.36 cycles, and RMSE = 36.62 cycles, followed by Light GBM and XG Boost, which significantly outperform linear models. Temperature–capacity interactions reveal non-monotonic effects: moderate temperatures of 20–25 °C enhance RUL, whereas extreme conditions of 0–5 °C and 30–40 °C accelerate degradation. This framework integrates electrochemical insights with data-driven modeling, supporting advanced battery management and thermal optimization strategies. These findings improve predictive reliability, enable early fault detection, and guide robust lifetime-aware control policies for practical deployment | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hadji, F., Hadji, A., Belfennache, D., Yekhlef, R., Fatmi, M., Alanazi, F. K., Yaylacı, M., & Abualreish, M. J. A. (2026). Explainable AI-based prediction of lithium-ion battery aging: A comparative study at low and moderate temperatures. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1018, 120421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2026.120421 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2026.120421 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1572-6657 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105044215011 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 120421 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2026.120421 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11436/13621 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 1018 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.institutionauthor | Yaylacı, Murat | |
| dc.institutionauthorid | 0000-0003-0407-1685 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Battery degradation | |
| dc.subject | Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy | |
| dc.subject | Ensemble learning | |
| dc.subject | Lithium-ion batteries | |
| dc.subject | Machine learning | |
| dc.subject | Predictive maintenance | |
| dc.subject | Remaining useful life | |
| dc.subject | SHAP interpretability | |
| dc.subject | Thermal management | |
| dc.title | Explainable AI-based prediction of lithium-ion battery aging: A comparative study at low and moderate temperatures | |
| dc.type | Article |











