Do laser-activated irrigation protocols improve endodontic success? A prospective clinical comparison of 1-year periapical healing with sonic, ultrasonic, manual dynamic and conventional techniques

Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim

Tarih

Dergi Başlığı

Dergi ISSN

Cilt Başlığı

Yayıncı

Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

Erişim Hakkı

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Özet

Background: Successful healing of chronic apical periodontitis after endodontic treatment requires a reduction in the size of the radiolucent area and the healing of the bone. This study aimed to compare the effects of different irrigation activation techniques on healing in single-rooted mandibular premolar teeth with periapical lesions of endodontic origin. Methods: A total of 132 systemically healthy patients with mandibular single-rooted premolar teeth and a periapical index (PAI) score ≥ 3 were assigned to five experimental groups (Sonic activation, Passive ultrasonic irrigation, Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming, Shock Wave Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming and Manual dynamic activation) and a control group (Conventional Syringe Irrigation). After access cavity preparation, the canals were prepared up to three sizes larger than the initial apical diameter with 5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl used between each file. Final irrigation was performed via the assigned activation system. The root canals were obturated with gutta-percha in a single visit. The effects of the activation systems on healing were compared at 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the change in lesion diameter. PAI score and fractal dimension (FD) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, FD values significantly increased, PAI scores and lesion size decreased in all groups compared with baseline (p < 0.001). However, the increase in FD was comparable among the irrigation groups (p > 0.05). In contrast, lesion size reduction and PAI-based healing rates favored the laser-activated groups. The PAI scores and lesion size in the control group were significantly greater than that in the laser groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: At the 1-year follow-up, all the groups presented similar FD increases, while the laser irrigation groups presented significantly greater reductions in lesion size than did the control group.

Açıklama

Anahtar Kelimeler

fractal analysis, irrigation activation, PAI, PIPS, SWEEPS

Kaynak

Diagnostics

WoS Q Değeri

Scopus Q Değeri

Cilt

16

Sayı

7

Künye

Çiçek, M., Şanal Çıkman, A., & Günaçar, D. N. (2026). Do Laser-Activated Irrigation Protocols Improve Endodontic Success? A Prospective Clinical Comparison of 1-Year Periapical Healing with Sonic, Ultrasonic, Manual Dynamic and Conventional Techniques. Diagnostics, 16(7), 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16071003

Onay

İnceleme

Ekleyen

Referans Veren