Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHatipoğlu, Ömer
dc.contributor.authorSaydam, Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-19T19:36:07Z
dc.date.available2020-12-19T19:36:07Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationHatipoglu, O., & Saydam, F. (2019). Effects of the carbonic anhydrase VI gene polymorphisms on dental caries: A meta-analysis. Dental and medical problems, 56(4), 395–400. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/110453en_US
dc.identifier.issn1644-387X
dc.identifier.issn2300-9020
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/110453
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/1397
dc.descriptionHatipoglu, Omer/0000-0002-4628-8551en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000507597600010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31895503en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Carbonic anhydrase VI (CA VI) is considered to greatly participate in the buffering of saliva, ion transport, the regulation of pH, secretory processes, and saliva production. Various studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between CA VI and dental caries. Objectives. the goal of this study was to make a meta-analysis of studies that examined the effects of the CA VI gene polymorphisms on dental caries. Material and methods. the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guide was followed. Electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were scanned by 2 independent researchers. the funnel plot, Egger's regression and Begg and Mazumdar's rank correlation test were used to determine publication bias. Cohen's d was used to measure the effect size. Results. Four studies were included in the meta-analysis; a total of 3 polymorphisms (rs2274327, rs2274328, rs2274333) and a total of 13 polymorphism models were analyzed. According to Egger's regression and the Begg and Mazumdar's test, the meta-analysis had no significant publication bias (p > 0.05). the highest susceptibility effect was noticed in the rs2274328 (AA vs CC) model (d = 0.18; 95% CI (confidence interval): -1.77, 2.13), but this effect was not significant (p = 0.237), and the highest protective effect was observed in the rs2274328 (AA vs AC) model (d = -0.13, 95% CI: -1.36, 1.11), but this effect was not significant, either (p = 0.195). No association was found between any of the polymorphism models and dental caries (p > 0.05). Conclusions. Even though CA VI plays an important role in the buffering of saliva, it was shown that polymorphisms in the CA VI gene did not affect the process of dental caries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPolish Dental Socen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSingle-nucleotide polymorphismen_US
dc.subjectMeta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectCaries susceptibilityen_US
dc.subjectDental caries resistanceen_US
dc.subjectHuman genomeen_US
dc.titleEffects of the carbonic anhydrase VI gene polymorphisms on dental caries: A meta-analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorSaydam, Faruk
dc.identifier.doi10.17219/dmp/110453
dc.identifier.volume56en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage395en_US
dc.identifier.endpage400en_US
dc.ri.editoaen_US
dc.relation.journalDental and Medical Problemsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster