| dc.contributor.author | Faruk Ursavas, Ömer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-19T20:04:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-12-19T20:04:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ursavas, O.F. (2013). Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: an answer to Teo (2009) and Nistor and Heymann (2010), and Lopez-Bonilla and Lopez-Bonilla (2011). British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E22-E25. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0007-1013 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8535 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01327.x | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11436/3371 | |
| dc.description | URSAVAS, Omer Faruk/0000-0002-5759-7894 | en_US |
| dc.description | WOS: 000314901300021 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | trIntroductionSeveral models have been developed to explain and predict the technology acceptance. Overthe years, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been widely accepted as a robust, pow-erful and parsimonious model capable of explaining user’s technology acceptance in a varietyof contexts. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Acceptance | en_US |
| dc.title | Reconsidering the role of attitude in the TAM: an answer to Teo (2009) and Nistor and Heymann (2010), and Lopez-Bonilla and Lopez-Bonilla (2011) | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | RTEÜ, Eğitim Fakültesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.contributor.institutionauthor | Faruk Ursavas, Ömer | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01327.x | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 44 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | E22 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | E25 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | British Journal of Educational Technology | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
