Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSünnetçi, Kubilay Muhammed
dc.contributor.authorKaba, Esat
dc.contributor.authorÇeliker, Fatma Beyazal
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-15T12:23:55Z
dc.date.available2024-10-15T12:23:55Z
dc.date.issued2024en_US
dc.identifier.citationSunnetci, K. M., Kaba, E., Celiker, F. B., & Alkan, A. (2024). MR Image Fusion-Based Parotid Gland Tumor Detection. Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01137-3en_US
dc.identifier.issn2948-2925
dc.identifier.issn2948-2933
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01137-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11436/9607
dc.description.abstractThe differentiation of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors is of major significance as it directly affects the treatment process. In addition, it is also a vital task in terms of early and accurate diagnosis of parotid gland tumors and the determination of treatment planning accordingly. As in other diseases, the differentiation of tumor types involves several challenging, time-consuming, and laborious processes. In the study, Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of 114 patients with parotid gland tumors are used for training and testing purposes by Image Fusion (IF). After the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), Contrast-enhanced T1-w (T1C-w), and T2-w sequences are cropped, IF (ADC, T1C-w), IF (ADC, T2-w), IF (T1C-w, T2-w), and IF (ADC, T1C-w, T2-w) datasets are obtained for different combinations of these sequences using a two-dimensional Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT)-based fusion technique. For each of these four datasets, ResNet18, GoogLeNet, and DenseNet-201 architectures are trained separately, and thus, 12 models are obtained in the study. A Graphical User Interface (GUI) application that contains the most successful of these trained architectures for each data is also designed to support the users. The designed GUI application not only allows the fusing of different sequence images but also predicts whether the label of the fused image is benign or malignant. The results show that the DenseNet-201 models for IF (ADC, T1C-w), IF (ADC, T2-w), and IF (ADC, T1C-w, T2-w) are better than the others, with accuracies of 95.45%, 95.96%, and 92.93%, respectively. It is also noted in the study that the most successful model for IF (T1C-w, T2-w) is ResNet18, and its accuracy is equal to 94.95%.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDeep learningen_US
dc.subjectImage fusionen_US
dc.subjectParotid gland tumorsen_US
dc.titleMR image fusion-based parotid gland tumor detectionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRTEÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKaba, Esat
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÇeliker, Fatma Beyazal
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10278-024-01137-3en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Imaging Informatics in Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster